Harrs A Civil Action Industrial Tort Law free essay sample

The real threat to big businesses of tort law and punitive damages. This paper uses the case discussed in Jonathon Harrs book `A Civil Action` to explain the system of Anglo/American tort law the workings and limitations of the system and the intended goals as opposed to real life actualities. It follows case facts and describes the outcome, while explaining all the ensuing legal factors. Also included is an account of the historical divergence of civil obligations and tort law. From the paper: `Harr?s book relates the story of a type of case that is all too sadly familiar: A large corporation (in this case actually two large corporations) contaminate the environment because it is cheaper dump solvents than to dispose of them legally. The reason that corporations are supposed to be restrained from such cheap but illegal dumping is the threat of either criminal charges being made or of civil litigation. We will write a custom essay sample on Harrs A Civil Action Industrial Tort Law or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page In other words, corporations are supposed to behave themselves because if they don?t then they will get sued. But the important catch to this argument, as this book shows, is that corporations do not in fact have a great deal to fear from civil litigation. All too often, the person who wins civil litigation is the person (or corporation) who can continue to pay for a lawyer longer than the other side. The results of civil litigation have less to do with right and wrong than with whose pockets were the deepest to begin with.`

Has the US Government Taken the Best Possible Resolution Aga essays

Has the US Government Taken the Best Possible Resolution Aga essays September the 11th was the day when emotions ran wild. One year on and the US government now plots its war against terrorism. The question we should ask ourselves however is "has the US government taken the best possible resolution against terrorism?" There can be only one answer, no. The US government has used a cruel aggression against terrorism, which hasn't accomplished its goal, but rather caused more terror in human actions. Hundreds of Innocent Afghans have been bombed due to errors made by the US air force. The attacks on Afghanistan are triggering a future attack on the US or countries rather than stopping it. Terrorism has not been defeated, it still lies behind our backs waiting for the perfect moment to attack. Innocent Afghans are caught in the crossfire between "peace" and "terror", however it seems like the "peace" has sided with "terror". Bombing Afghanistan makes us look like we are real terrorist. The fact that these killings are occurring tells us only one thing, we are hypocrites. However, it is not our fault that these ignorant people from the US government believe it is of the best interest for the world to fight against terrorism with extreme force. In an incident with a village wedding party was accidentally which proves the dangers and vulnerability of the civilians. 2There were 40 fatalities and 100 others injured from that one incident, however this was just one of the many incidents. These facts shows us that the US government isnt just attacking the terrorist who were responsible for September 11th. However, the striking fact is that the US governments remains unconvinced that they are responsible for the lives in Afghan as it has been quoted 1 they (the US government) ha ve been reluctant to confirm that air strikes were responsible for the casualties. The US air force claims that the Afghans were attacking the air fighters and that the air force had no choice bu...

Environmental protection is more important than economic profits Essay

Environmental protection is more important than economic profits - Essay Example Given the increased world population, there is a strain on the natural resources as people depend on natural resources to advance industrially and technologically. Today, because of the rivalry between environmental protection and economic profits, countries have failed to implement their different laid down environmental policies effectively, and this has put the environment at a greater risk of continued degradation, which will be detrimental to the human population in future. The debate whether to make environmental protection a priority or not applies to all world countries. In most countries, all corporations and businesses must have their environmental policy; this shows how crucial the environment is. However, do corporations fulfil their environmental policies, or is it just for a show? Today, scientists and other experts recognize the looming effects of the environmental hazard. Therefore, corrective measures should be taken today to ensure restoration of the environment, th an waiting until things go out of hand. Natural law does not forgive, then why provoke it yet its wrath is hard to withstand? The environment today is in a pathetic state. The amount of natural forests cleared is devastating. It is saddening how humans are mercilessly strangling Mother Nature, and yet it is from her they get their breath of life. Humans destroy the environment in pursuit of their economic establishments. The knowledge humans lack is that once they are done destroying mother nature, all their technological and industrial advances, and booming economies will count as nothing when mother nature’s provoked ghost comes back to haunt them. Their mega economies will be destroyed, including the populations, and this is quite derogatory. It is therefore sensible that states change their greedy ways and stop overexploiting the environment in pursuit of their economic ambitions. The desires for economic profits should not override the importance of the environment. Glob al warming is already here with us. This has resulted in a great instability in the environment. Its effects are witnessed every day. The tsunamis, hurricanes, tornados, and floods cause great destructions in the affected countries, lives are lost, property destroyed, infrastructure destroyed, and families displaced. Scenes from the more recent hurricane Sandy can attest to this. This destroyed communication lines, buildings, roads, and other infrastructure, in addition to the loss of lives and displacements of families. This will cost the USA millions of dollars to fix. Therefore, establishing the economy at the expense of the environment is like a zero-sum game. The environment will always get back to us and damage the economies. Therefore, the environment proves that it is the most important. Environmental protection is a matter of life and death in all countries. Today individuals, states, scientists and countries in general realize that the future of the planet earth is in dire need of safeguarding, due to the environmental massacre that is witnessed today, all in the name of economic advancement. The main elements in state economies, which lead to environmental degradation, are the by-products from industries. Industrialization is good for human survival as it positively influences the economy. However, lack of controlled industrialization is what causes environmental protection and economic profits to be at loggerheads. Today, we